"Tutors who make youth learned do not always make them virtuous"
About this Quote
Learning can sharpen the mind without reshaping the heart. Richardson draws a clear line between knowledge and goodness, warning that a teacher can fill a young head with languages, logic, and polish while leaving the conscience untouched. Virtue is not a technique or a set of facts; it is a habit of choosing the good, formed through example, discipline, and self-scrutiny. A tutor may cultivate brilliance and wit yet fail to guide desire, pride, or fear. Worse, eloquence without ethics can become a tool for manipulation, making moral failures more effective rather than less.
As an 18th-century novelist and moralist, Richardson wrote during a period when the expanding culture of schooling and print promised refinement. He watched a rising middle class prize accomplishments and fashionable sensibility, even as public virtue seemed precarious. His fiction often contrasts worldly education with moral resilience. The most dangerous characters are sometimes the most learned: they write beautifully, reason cleverly, and charm effortlessly, but their education only arms their appetites. Meanwhile, the heroines and heroes who strive for integrity rely on conscience, religious sentiment, and the steady practice of duty more than on displays of erudition.
The phrasing do not always is careful. It does not dismiss learning; it insists that learning alone is insufficient. When instruction is joined to a worthy model, to just discipline, and to a community that prizes honesty, study can deepen virtue by clarifying the good and training the will to pursue it. When severed from those supports, instruction risks becoming ornament or weapon.
The observation travels well into the present. Schools can chase credentials and test scores while neglecting character, civic responsibility, and empathy. Mentors matter not just for what they know but for what they are. The measure of education is not merely a sharpened intellect, but a rightly ordered life.
As an 18th-century novelist and moralist, Richardson wrote during a period when the expanding culture of schooling and print promised refinement. He watched a rising middle class prize accomplishments and fashionable sensibility, even as public virtue seemed precarious. His fiction often contrasts worldly education with moral resilience. The most dangerous characters are sometimes the most learned: they write beautifully, reason cleverly, and charm effortlessly, but their education only arms their appetites. Meanwhile, the heroines and heroes who strive for integrity rely on conscience, religious sentiment, and the steady practice of duty more than on displays of erudition.
The phrasing do not always is careful. It does not dismiss learning; it insists that learning alone is insufficient. When instruction is joined to a worthy model, to just discipline, and to a community that prizes honesty, study can deepen virtue by clarifying the good and training the will to pursue it. When severed from those supports, instruction risks becoming ornament or weapon.
The observation travels well into the present. Schools can chase credentials and test scores while neglecting character, civic responsibility, and empathy. Mentors matter not just for what they know but for what they are. The measure of education is not merely a sharpened intellect, but a rightly ordered life.
Quote Details
| Topic | Teaching |
|---|
More Quotes by Samuel
Add to List
