"We Orientals find beauty not only in the thing itself but in the pattern of the shadows, the light and darkness which that thing provides"
About this Quote
Tanizaki is smuggling a whole aesthetic manifesto into a sentence that sounds, at first blush, like a gracious preference. The pivot is “not only”: he isn’t denying beauty in the object, he’s demoting the object from center stage. What matters is the relational drama around it - the “pattern” made by light and darkness, the way an ordinary thing becomes expressive once it’s placed inside a field of shadow. Beauty, for Tanizaki, isn’t a spotlight; it’s an atmosphere.
The phrasing “We Orientals” is doing charged work. Read today, it risks sounding like an essentialist bloc. In context, it’s closer to a strategic “we” - a rhetorical counterweight to the modernizing, Westernizing pressure Japan faced in the early 20th century. Tanizaki’s intent in essays like In Praise of Shadows is less ethnography than resistance: against electric brightness, chrome surfaces, and the kind of progress that mistakes visibility for value. Shadows become a cultural argument: ambiguity as sophistication, dimness as intimacy, patina as history.
Subtextually, he’s also attacking a consumer logic that treats objects as self-sufficient commodities. If beauty lives partly in what’s withheld, then it can’t be fully packaged, standardized, or photographed into submission. The “pattern” implies time, angle, and presence - you have to inhabit a space long enough to notice how darkness edits it. Tanizaki’s line works because it turns limitation into method: what you can’t quite see becomes the very source of depth.
The phrasing “We Orientals” is doing charged work. Read today, it risks sounding like an essentialist bloc. In context, it’s closer to a strategic “we” - a rhetorical counterweight to the modernizing, Westernizing pressure Japan faced in the early 20th century. Tanizaki’s intent in essays like In Praise of Shadows is less ethnography than resistance: against electric brightness, chrome surfaces, and the kind of progress that mistakes visibility for value. Shadows become a cultural argument: ambiguity as sophistication, dimness as intimacy, patina as history.
Subtextually, he’s also attacking a consumer logic that treats objects as self-sufficient commodities. If beauty lives partly in what’s withheld, then it can’t be fully packaged, standardized, or photographed into submission. The “pattern” implies time, angle, and presence - you have to inhabit a space long enough to notice how darkness edits it. Tanizaki’s line works because it turns limitation into method: what you can’t quite see becomes the very source of depth.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | In Praise of Shadows (In'ei Raisan), Jun'ichiro Tanizaki, 1933 — essay/book on aesthetics; the cited line appears in English translations describing beauty in light, darkness, and shadows. |
More Quotes by Junichiro
Add to List







