"Government cannot be all things to all people"
About this Quote
Jane D. Hull distilled a pragmatic view of governing rooted in limits, tradeoffs, and pluralism. A state cannot print endless money or time, and every public choice carries opportunity costs. Democratic societies teem with competing needs, values, and constituencies; promising to satisfy all of them, all at once, is not leadership but illusion. The phrase rejects magical thinking and insists on the discipline of priority.
Coming from Arizona’s first woman elected governor, a former teacher and Republican legislative leader, the line reads as both principle and hard-won lesson. Arizona in the late 1990s and early 2000s faced rapid growth, a strained tax base, rural-urban divides, water management challenges, and widening expectations for schools and social services. Hull pushed for balanced budgets and education standards while navigating the fallout of the alternative-fuels tax credit debacle, a policy that ballooned far beyond projections when incentives tried to be too generous for too many. That episode underscored how trying to please broad swaths of the public without clear guardrails can produce fiscal whiplash and erode trust.
The statement also nods to constitutional design. American government is bounded by checks and balances and by federalism that distributes roles among federal, state, local, and non-governmental actors. Some problems are better solved by families, communities, markets, or civic groups; others require targeted public action. Recognizing those boundaries protects both effectiveness and liberty. It is a reminder that saying no can be an ethical choice when saying yes would dilute capacity or crowd out civil society.
Underlying the line is a plea for candor. Good governance is not about universal accommodation but about transparent priority-setting, evidence-based policy, and steady attention to long-term consequences. Leaders who accept that government cannot be all things make room for it to be the right things: focused, fair, and accountable, especially to those whose needs are greatest.
Coming from Arizona’s first woman elected governor, a former teacher and Republican legislative leader, the line reads as both principle and hard-won lesson. Arizona in the late 1990s and early 2000s faced rapid growth, a strained tax base, rural-urban divides, water management challenges, and widening expectations for schools and social services. Hull pushed for balanced budgets and education standards while navigating the fallout of the alternative-fuels tax credit debacle, a policy that ballooned far beyond projections when incentives tried to be too generous for too many. That episode underscored how trying to please broad swaths of the public without clear guardrails can produce fiscal whiplash and erode trust.
The statement also nods to constitutional design. American government is bounded by checks and balances and by federalism that distributes roles among federal, state, local, and non-governmental actors. Some problems are better solved by families, communities, markets, or civic groups; others require targeted public action. Recognizing those boundaries protects both effectiveness and liberty. It is a reminder that saying no can be an ethical choice when saying yes would dilute capacity or crowd out civil society.
Underlying the line is a plea for candor. Good governance is not about universal accommodation but about transparent priority-setting, evidence-based policy, and steady attention to long-term consequences. Leaders who accept that government cannot be all things make room for it to be the right things: focused, fair, and accountable, especially to those whose needs are greatest.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Jane
Add to List
