"Revolution in the modern case is no longer an uncouth business"
About this Quote
Garet Garrett compresses a whole political theory into a single jab: the real revolutions of modernity do not arrive with torches, barricades, and mobs; they come wearing neckties, carrying binders, and speaking the language of necessity. A leading voice of the American Old Right, Garrett argued in his 1938 essay The Revolution Was that the New Deal had already transformed the American republic by administrative means. He called it a revolution within the form: the familiar institutions remained intact, but their living substance was redirected by executive agencies, emergency powers, and the authority of experts.
No longer an uncouth business means no broken idols and toppled statues are required. The upheaval proceeds by statute, regulation, and fiscal machinery; by acronyms rather than slogans; by press conference instead of street confrontation. It is polite, targeted, and technically justified. Budgets and bureaucracies shift the center of gravity while the constitutionally theatrical parts of government keep up appearances. Elections are held, courts convene, Congress debates. Meanwhile, power migrates to administrative organs, and the public grows accustomed to extraordinary measures made ordinary by repetition.
Garrett’s insight is not simply a critique of the 1930s. It isolates a method of transformation that thrives in mass societies: legitimation through expertise, normalization through procedure, and consent manufactured by media. When revolution turns decorous, the cues that once signaled rupture fail. People look for riot and get rulemaking; they expect banners and see spreadsheets. Because the process appears orderly and lawful, it disarms resistance and reframes dissent as ignorance of complex necessities.
The line doubles as a warning about political perception. If the form survives but the function is replaced, if administrative fiat eclipses deliberative consent, then the test of liberty shifts from symbols to mechanisms. To guard a republic you must watch the plumbing, not just the facade. The uncouth has been exchanged for the managerial, but the stakes are unchanged: who decides, under what authority, and by what limits.
No longer an uncouth business means no broken idols and toppled statues are required. The upheaval proceeds by statute, regulation, and fiscal machinery; by acronyms rather than slogans; by press conference instead of street confrontation. It is polite, targeted, and technically justified. Budgets and bureaucracies shift the center of gravity while the constitutionally theatrical parts of government keep up appearances. Elections are held, courts convene, Congress debates. Meanwhile, power migrates to administrative organs, and the public grows accustomed to extraordinary measures made ordinary by repetition.
Garrett’s insight is not simply a critique of the 1930s. It isolates a method of transformation that thrives in mass societies: legitimation through expertise, normalization through procedure, and consent manufactured by media. When revolution turns decorous, the cues that once signaled rupture fail. People look for riot and get rulemaking; they expect banners and see spreadsheets. Because the process appears orderly and lawful, it disarms resistance and reframes dissent as ignorance of complex necessities.
The line doubles as a warning about political perception. If the form survives but the function is replaced, if administrative fiat eclipses deliberative consent, then the test of liberty shifts from symbols to mechanisms. To guard a republic you must watch the plumbing, not just the facade. The uncouth has been exchanged for the managerial, but the stakes are unchanged: who decides, under what authority, and by what limits.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Garet
Add to List
