"The assumption that nature is all there is, and that nature has been governed by the same rules at all times and places, makes it possible for natural science to be confident that it can explain such things as how life began"
About this Quote
Phillip E. Johnson slips a scalpel under science’s self-confidence and lifts: not a fact, but an assumption. The line is engineered to sound modest - who could object to “nature is all there is” and “the same rules at all times and places”? - yet it’s a strategic reframing. By calling methodological naturalism an “assumption,” Johnson recasts what working scientists treat as a practical rule (stick to testable causes) into a metaphysical wager (only natural causes exist). That move matters because it shifts the argument from evidence to legitimacy: if the rule is optional, then rival explanations can demand equal standing.
The subtext is a courtroom cross-examination. Johnson isn’t trying to out-explain abiogenesis; he’s trying to undermine the jury’s trust in the prosecution’s methods. “Makes it possible” is doing heavy lifting: science’s confidence is portrayed as something enabled by a prior commitment, not earned by results. The implied punchline is that origin-of-life research isn’t merely incomplete; it’s structurally constrained from considering anything beyond nature, so its confidence looks like circular reasoning.
Context sharpens the intent. Johnson, a leading voice in the Intelligent Design movement, wrote at a moment when cultural battles over evolution were migrating from overt biblical claims to critiques of “scientism” and “naturalism.” The quote is less a scientific point than a rhetorical wedge: pry apart “science” as a method and “naturalism” as a worldview, then argue that schools and courts have smuggled the latter in under the former’s lab coat. It works because it targets a real philosophical seam - but it also banks on conflating a disciplined boundary (what science can test) with a grand claim (what reality is).
The subtext is a courtroom cross-examination. Johnson isn’t trying to out-explain abiogenesis; he’s trying to undermine the jury’s trust in the prosecution’s methods. “Makes it possible” is doing heavy lifting: science’s confidence is portrayed as something enabled by a prior commitment, not earned by results. The implied punchline is that origin-of-life research isn’t merely incomplete; it’s structurally constrained from considering anything beyond nature, so its confidence looks like circular reasoning.
Context sharpens the intent. Johnson, a leading voice in the Intelligent Design movement, wrote at a moment when cultural battles over evolution were migrating from overt biblical claims to critiques of “scientism” and “naturalism.” The quote is less a scientific point than a rhetorical wedge: pry apart “science” as a method and “naturalism” as a worldview, then argue that schools and courts have smuggled the latter in under the former’s lab coat. It works because it targets a real philosophical seam - but it also banks on conflating a disciplined boundary (what science can test) with a grand claim (what reality is).
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Phillip
Add to List
