"On the surface we all act like we all love each other and we're free and easy, and actually we're far more moralistic than any other society I've ever lived in"
About this Quote
Kathy Acker exposes the dissonance between a culture that markets itself as loving and liberated and the everyday severity with which it judges bodies and behavior. Having lived between New York’s downtown scenes, San Francisco, and London, she watched American freedom perform as a smile while the law, media, and neighbors police desire. The cheery surface of being free and easy is not nothing; it is a tactic. Therapeutic language, inclusivity slogans, and a chill vibe smooth the edges of a moral order that still sorts the pure from the impure, the respectable from the obscene, and the legitimate voice from the deviant one.
Her fiction and performances were built to snag on that surface. Appropriation, explicit sex, and taboo voices were not merely shock; they were tests of a culture’s claim to tolerance. The backlash she drew, from censorship scares to academic handwringing, embodied the very moralism she names. In the Reagan and Thatcher years, a rhetoric of choice and prosperity fused with family values and decency campaigns; during the AIDS crisis, desire itself was moralized. Even subcultures that announced themselves as free often hid rigid codes about how to dress, speak, and transgress. Acker’s line cuts through both mainstream and counterculture, showing how rebellion easily becomes aesthetic while control remains practical.
The comparison to other places she lived sharpens the point. Some European milieus wore their norms more openly; America, in her view, perfected a softer, managerial kind of judgment. The more a society insists it is free, the more it relies on invisible mechanisms to maintain order: HR policies in place of censors, market pressures in place of bans, public shaming in place of law. The sentence is a demand for clarity. Distinguish genuine solidarity from mandated niceness; distinguish autonomy from consumer permission. Watch for the moment when the language of love becomes a screen for discipline, and when the promise of freedom is deployed to keep people in line.
Her fiction and performances were built to snag on that surface. Appropriation, explicit sex, and taboo voices were not merely shock; they were tests of a culture’s claim to tolerance. The backlash she drew, from censorship scares to academic handwringing, embodied the very moralism she names. In the Reagan and Thatcher years, a rhetoric of choice and prosperity fused with family values and decency campaigns; during the AIDS crisis, desire itself was moralized. Even subcultures that announced themselves as free often hid rigid codes about how to dress, speak, and transgress. Acker’s line cuts through both mainstream and counterculture, showing how rebellion easily becomes aesthetic while control remains practical.
The comparison to other places she lived sharpens the point. Some European milieus wore their norms more openly; America, in her view, perfected a softer, managerial kind of judgment. The more a society insists it is free, the more it relies on invisible mechanisms to maintain order: HR policies in place of censors, market pressures in place of bans, public shaming in place of law. The sentence is a demand for clarity. Distinguish genuine solidarity from mandated niceness; distinguish autonomy from consumer permission. Watch for the moment when the language of love becomes a screen for discipline, and when the promise of freedom is deployed to keep people in line.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Kathy
Add to List
