"Publicity is a great purifier because it sets in action the forces of public opinion, and in this country public opinion controls the courses of the nation"
About this Quote
Transparency cleanses because it activates a power greater than private influence: the organized pressure of public opinion. Charles Evans Hughes spoke from the heart of the Progressive Era, when exposure of corporate and political abuses fueled reform. As a lawyer, governor, presidential candidate, and ultimately Chief Justice, he repeatedly saw that open hearings and vigorous reporting could do what backroom negotiation could not. Publicity forces facts into the light, alters incentives, and makes concealment costlier than compliance.
The claim rests on a democratic premise: in the United States, public opinion is not mere chatter but the ultimate governor. Elections, legislative oversight, jury verdicts, and the informal sanctions of reputation translate sentiment into power. When wrongdoing or folly is publicized, voters and consumers respond, officials recalibrate, and institutions adjust course. The process can be messy, but its cumulative effect disciplines authority.
Hughes’s faith in publicity aligns with the period’s reformers, including Louis Brandeis, who likened sunlight to disinfectant. Hughes had watched sensational yet substantive investigations of life insurance and utilities lead to concrete regulation. Publicity does not punish on its own; it sets in motion networks of journalists, civic groups, and legal mechanisms that carry consequences. It is less a sword than an amplifier, turning private knowledge into a public mandate.
He was not naive about the fragility of this remedy. Public opinion can be manipulated, and spectacle can crowd out substance. Yet the argument assumes that, given adequate information and time, a broad electorate corrects errors better than insulated elites. The remedy is more and better publicity, not less: clearer facts, wider access, and institutions designed for openness.
The line still resonates in an age of social media and freedom-of-information laws. Democratic self-rule depends on the informed judgment of citizens, and publicity is the channel through which that judgment gains force enough to steer the nation.
The claim rests on a democratic premise: in the United States, public opinion is not mere chatter but the ultimate governor. Elections, legislative oversight, jury verdicts, and the informal sanctions of reputation translate sentiment into power. When wrongdoing or folly is publicized, voters and consumers respond, officials recalibrate, and institutions adjust course. The process can be messy, but its cumulative effect disciplines authority.
Hughes’s faith in publicity aligns with the period’s reformers, including Louis Brandeis, who likened sunlight to disinfectant. Hughes had watched sensational yet substantive investigations of life insurance and utilities lead to concrete regulation. Publicity does not punish on its own; it sets in motion networks of journalists, civic groups, and legal mechanisms that carry consequences. It is less a sword than an amplifier, turning private knowledge into a public mandate.
He was not naive about the fragility of this remedy. Public opinion can be manipulated, and spectacle can crowd out substance. Yet the argument assumes that, given adequate information and time, a broad electorate corrects errors better than insulated elites. The remedy is more and better publicity, not less: clearer facts, wider access, and institutions designed for openness.
The line still resonates in an age of social media and freedom-of-information laws. Democratic self-rule depends on the informed judgment of citizens, and publicity is the channel through which that judgment gains force enough to steer the nation.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Charles
Add to List
