"We must carefully examine change so that we are able to discard those aspects of change which would be detrimental to our way of life, and, at the same time, take advantage of those aspects of change which will enhance and improve our quality of life"
About this Quote
Change is treated here less like destiny than like a policy proposal: something to be audited, amended, and, when necessary, voted down. Alex Campbell frames modernity as a mixed bag, insisting on agency at the exact moment political rhetoric often pretends we have none. The repeating scaffolding - "discard... take advantage" - is managerial on purpose. It reassures an anxious public that upheaval can be domesticated by careful scrutiny, the way a legislature turns raw events into regulations.
The intent is to occupy the safest possible high ground in a culture war without sounding evasive. Campbell doesnt reject change (which would read as reactionary) or celebrate it (which can sound reckless). He endorses selective adaptation, a position that flatters the audience: you are prudent enough to distinguish improvement from erosion. "Our way of life" is doing heavy work as a placeholder for shared norms - family structures, economic arrangements, civic identity - while staying vague enough to include whoever is listening. That vagueness is the subtextual bargain: unity through elastic language.
Contextually, it reads like the voice of late-20th-century governance, when globalization, technological acceleration, and shifting social values made "change" feel both inevitable and suspicious. The line also signals paternal competence: leaders will "carefully examine" the future on your behalf. The risk, of course, is that the criteria for whats "detrimental" get defined by whoever holds power. The sentence sells moderation, but it quietly asserts authority over which changes get to count as progress.
The intent is to occupy the safest possible high ground in a culture war without sounding evasive. Campbell doesnt reject change (which would read as reactionary) or celebrate it (which can sound reckless). He endorses selective adaptation, a position that flatters the audience: you are prudent enough to distinguish improvement from erosion. "Our way of life" is doing heavy work as a placeholder for shared norms - family structures, economic arrangements, civic identity - while staying vague enough to include whoever is listening. That vagueness is the subtextual bargain: unity through elastic language.
Contextually, it reads like the voice of late-20th-century governance, when globalization, technological acceleration, and shifting social values made "change" feel both inevitable and suspicious. The line also signals paternal competence: leaders will "carefully examine" the future on your behalf. The risk, of course, is that the criteria for whats "detrimental" get defined by whoever holds power. The sentence sells moderation, but it quietly asserts authority over which changes get to count as progress.
Quote Details
| Topic | Change |
|---|
More Quotes by Alex
Add to List





