"Writing is a dog's life, but the only life worth living"
About this Quote
Flaubert doesn’t romanticize authorship; he animalizes it. “A dog’s life” lands with the thud of daily indignity: obedience to routine, hunger for approval, isolation, and the constant threat of being kicked by failure, criticism, or your own standards. It’s also a sly self-portrait. Flaubert was notorious for punishing revision, for treating a single sentence as a moral problem. If writing is canine, it’s because it’s bodily and humiliating work, not the perfumed leisure we like to imagine.
Then comes the pivot that makes the line sting: “but the only life worth living.” The conjunction is the whole psychology. Flaubert is confessing to a kind of voluntary servitude. He may resent the labor, but he distrusts every alternative more: society’s chatter, bourgeois comfort, easy opinions. In 19th-century France, with its rising middle-class respectability, that last clause reads like a refusal to be domesticated by domesticity. The novelist chooses the kennel over the parlor because the kennel, at least, faces the truth of effort.
The subtext is not “suffering makes you great.” It’s harsher: meaning is something you submit to. Writing, for Flaubert, isn’t self-expression; it’s self-erasure in pursuit of exactness, the “mot juste” as an ethic. The line works because it’s both complaint and creed, a grim joke that doubles as a vow: if you’re going to be miserable anyway, you might as well earn it by making something that outlasts you.
Then comes the pivot that makes the line sting: “but the only life worth living.” The conjunction is the whole psychology. Flaubert is confessing to a kind of voluntary servitude. He may resent the labor, but he distrusts every alternative more: society’s chatter, bourgeois comfort, easy opinions. In 19th-century France, with its rising middle-class respectability, that last clause reads like a refusal to be domesticated by domesticity. The novelist chooses the kennel over the parlor because the kennel, at least, faces the truth of effort.
The subtext is not “suffering makes you great.” It’s harsher: meaning is something you submit to. Writing, for Flaubert, isn’t self-expression; it’s self-erasure in pursuit of exactness, the “mot juste” as an ethic. The line works because it’s both complaint and creed, a grim joke that doubles as a vow: if you’re going to be miserable anyway, you might as well earn it by making something that outlasts you.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Gustave
Add to List




